Lattice
Lattice helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.
Lattice is better for HR teams that want one platform for performance management, OKRs, compensation, and engagement under a modular pricing model. Culture Amp is better for HR teams where engagement survey quality, people analytics depth, and evidence-based HR methodology are the primary purchase driver. This comparison covers feature depth, pricing, implementation, and the team profiles that get the most from each platform.
Lattice and Culture Amp both sit in the people management platform category, but they have evolved from different starting points. Culture Amp grew from employee surveys and engagement analytics — the platform is strongest when HR teams need deep engagement data and action planning. Lattice grew from performance reviews and has built out a broader people management suite. The decision often depends on whether your HR team's highest priority is engagement depth or a unified performance and development system.
Why trust this comparison
Independent editorial comparison. No vendor paid for placement. Named author attribution, visible update dates, and analysis written for buyers — not vendors.
Lattice helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.
Culture Amp helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, deployment, platform support, and trial availability.
| Criteria | Lattice | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Deployment model | Cloud | Cloud |
| Supported Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS |
| Free trial | Not listed | Not listed |
Lattice and Culture Amp are both classified as people management or employee experience platforms, but they have different origins and different product cores. Lattice was built as a performance management platform that expanded into engagement, OKRs, and compensation — a suite assembled around the performance review cycle. Culture Amp was built as an employee survey and analytics platform that expanded into performance reviews and development — a suite assembled around listening and data.
The buyer at this comparison stage is typically a CHRO, VP of People, or HR director at a 200–2,000 employee company who has outgrown their basic performance review process and wants a more intentional people platform. The evaluation usually starts with performance management but quickly expands to include engagement surveys, goal tracking, and sometimes compensation — because the buyer wants to avoid managing five separate point solutions for functions that are conceptually related.
A third platform frequently mentioned alongside both Lattice and Culture Amp is 15Five, which appears in multiple third-party comparison results for this keyword. 15Five positions on continuous feedback and weekly check-ins as the foundation of performance management, rather than formal review cycles. It is worth including in the evaluation if the team's priority is lightweight ongoing feedback rather than formal structured performance management or deep engagement analytics.
Performance management is strong on both platforms. Lattice supports 360-degree reviews, self-assessments, manager reviews, quarterly and annual cycles, calibration workflows, and meeting notes. Culture Amp's performance module covers similar ground — review cycles, 360 feedback, goal alignment — with a design influence from its survey roots that makes the review UX feel more structured around measurement than workflow. For companies that want structured performance cycles with calibration, both platforms are capable. Lattice's calibration tools and compensation integration are more developed.
Engagement surveys are Culture Amp's original core strength. Culture Amp's survey methodology is evidence-based — developed with academic partners and backed by a benchmarking database from thousands of organizations globally. Culture Amp's benchmark data lets HR teams compare their engagement scores against industry, company size, and geographic peers, which creates defensible data for leadership presentations. Lattice's engagement surveys are functional and cover standard pulse and annual survey formats, but the benchmarking depth and survey science rigor are not at the same level as Culture Amp.
OKR and goal management is Lattice's relative strength. Lattice's goal module supports company-level, team-level, and individual OKRs with cascading alignment, progress tracking, and integration with the performance review cycle. The goal-to-review connection in Lattice — where OKR progress feeds directly into performance assessments — is more fluid than Culture Amp's goal tracking, which is more basic. For companies with OKR as a core operating rhythm, Lattice's goal module is more developed.
Compensation management is available in Lattice (Lattice Compensation) but not a core Culture Amp offering. Lattice Compensation handles merit cycles, compensation band management, pay equity analysis, and manager compensation recommendations in one workflow connected to performance data. For HR teams that want to connect performance ratings directly to compensation decisions within one platform, Lattice's compensation module is a genuine differentiator. Culture Amp does not offer a native compensation management product.
People analytics and reporting reflect each platform's origins. Culture Amp's people analytics module provides engagement trend analysis, driver analysis (which engagement factors correlate most with outcomes at your organization), cohort comparisons, and heatmap reporting by department, manager, tenure, and demographics. These analytics are genuinely useful for HR teams trying to understand why engagement is high or low in specific pockets of the organization. Lattice's analytics are solid for tracking performance and engagement metrics over time but less sophisticated on the diagnostic side.
Your HR team wants one platform for performance management, OKRs, engagement surveys, and compensation management. You run structured quarterly or annual performance review cycles where calibration and rating normalization matter. Your company uses OKRs as a primary goal-setting framework and wants them connected to performance reviews. You want modular pricing — the ability to activate and pay for only the modules you need (Performance, Engagement, Grow, Compensation, OKRs) rather than a bundled platform cost.
Engagement data quality and people analytics are the primary purchase driver. You present engagement survey results to leadership or boards and need defensible, methodology-backed data with external benchmarks. Your HR team includes or reports to a people analytics function that wants driver analysis, cohort comparisons, and predictive attrition insights. You want the best engagement survey science in the category, not just functional survey tooling.
Drop Lattice if your primary need is engagement analytics depth and you do not need OKR or compensation management — Culture Amp's analytics will create more value. Drop it if your budget is constrained and the modular pricing of Lattice across multiple modules totals higher than expected — get a fully loaded quote before assuming Lattice is the cheaper option at your desired feature set.
Drop Culture Amp if OKR management and compensation management are in scope — Culture Amp does not offer these natively and you will need separate tools. Drop it if you want one vendor for the full people management stack. Drop it if your budget is limited and Lattice's modular pricing lets you start with performance only and expand later, while Culture Amp's bundled pricing requires a larger initial commitment.
Lattice uses modular pricing. Based on market data, individual modules are priced approximately as follows: Performance Management ~$11/person/month, Engagement ~$4/person/month, Grow (career development) ~$4/person/month, Compensation ~$6/person/month, OKRs + Goals ~$8/person/month. A company using Performance plus Engagement would pay approximately $15/person/month. Adding OKRs and Compensation brings total cost to approximately $29/person/month for a fully loaded Lattice platform. All pricing is per seat per month with annual billing. Lattice pricing requires a sales conversation for a formal quote — the above is based on published market data and may vary by company size and contract terms.
Lattice's modular model is both its pricing advantage and its complexity risk. Companies can start with Performance Management only (~$11/person/month) and add modules as the HR team matures. However, companies that eventually want the full platform — Performance, Engagement, Grow, OKRs, and Compensation — can end up at $29+/person/month, which is a significant per-seat cost at mid-market headcounts. Request a bundled platform quote alongside individual module pricing to understand the discount available for multi-module commitments.
Culture Amp pricing is also contact-based. Based on market data, Culture Amp is priced as a bundled platform rather than individual modules — the Engage (engagement surveys + analytics) package and the Perform (performance reviews + goals) package are typically quoted together. Market data suggests Culture Amp pricing is in the $5–15/person/month range depending on which modules are included and company size. Culture Amp does not offer a free trial — all evaluations are sales-assisted. Culture Amp typically requires a minimum company size and minimum contract value.
Lattice implementations for the core Performance Management module typically run 4–8 weeks for companies in the 200–500 employee range. Adding Engagement surveys can be done in a few days once the core platform is live. Adding Compensation management is the most complex addition and may extend the timeline by 4–6 weeks to configure compensation bands and calibration workflows. Lattice provides structured onboarding and a large self-serve resource library. Most implementations are HR-led without dedicated IT support.
Culture Amp implementations for Engage (surveys only) can be completed in 1–2 weeks from contract signing — the platform is designed for fast survey deployment. Adding Performance to the Culture Amp platform typically runs 4–8 weeks depending on how many review cycle customizations are needed. Culture Amp provides onboarding support and an HR science team that advises on survey design and cadence for customers. For companies that are running their first structured engagement survey program, Culture Amp's HR science guidance is a genuine implementation advantage.
Lattice is the right choice for HR teams at 150–2,000 employee companies that want one platform for the full people management lifecycle — performance, goals, engagement, development, and compensation — and are willing to pay for the modules they need over time. Lattice is particularly well-suited for companies with active OKR programs, structured performance calibration workflows, or compensation cycles where manager recommendations need to be informed by performance data in the same system.
The honest caution on Lattice: the modular pricing model can create cost surprises as more modules are activated. A company that starts with Performance only and gradually adds Engagement, OKRs, and Compensation over 18 months may find their total per-seat cost significantly higher than the initial contract. Build a 24-month cost model at full module activation before signing, not just the entry-point cost.
Culture Amp is the right choice for HR and People Analytics teams at 200–5,000 employee companies where data-driven people decisions are the primary HR priority. Culture Amp's benchmarking database, survey science rigor, and driver analysis tools create the most defensible engagement data in the category — which matters most to HR leaders who need to present people data to boards, investors, or executive leadership. Companies with a dedicated people analytics function get the most from Culture Amp's data infrastructure.
The honest caution on Culture Amp: companies that buy Culture Amp for Engage and add Performance later sometimes find that the Performance module UX is less intuitive than Lattice's for HR teams used to workflow-driven tools. Culture Amp's performance features work, but the user experience is more analytically oriented than action-oriented. Hiring managers often find Lattice's performance review interface more straightforward.
Choose Lattice if: you want one platform for performance, OKRs, engagement, and compensation. You run structured review cycles with calibration. Your company uses OKRs as a primary operating framework. You want modular pricing control.
Choose Culture Amp if: engagement analytics and survey methodology are the primary purchase driver. You present people data to leadership and need externally benchmarked, methodology-backed insights. You have or are building a people analytics function. You want the most credible engagement science in the category.
The question that often resolves this: who will primarily own and use this platform — an HRBP focused on driving performance and goal conversations, or a people analytics team focused on diagnosing engagement and attrition? If the HRBP, Lattice. If people analytics, Culture Amp.
Question 1
Both platforms handle standard performance review cycles well. Lattice has a practical edge for companies with complex calibration workflows and compensation integration — its review-to-compensation connection is more seamlessly built in. Culture Amp's performance UX is more analytically oriented. For straightforward review cycles, both work well. For calibration and comp cycle integration, Lattice is more developed.
Question 2
Culture Amp offers basic goal tracking but does not have a full OKR management module comparable to Lattice's. Culture Amp's goals feature supports individual and team goals with progress tracking, but the OKR cascading, alignment visualization, and check-in workflow that Lattice offers in its dedicated OKRs module are not available in Culture Amp's current product.
Question 3
Lattice uses modular pricing. Based on market data: Performance Management ~$11/person/month, Engagement ~$4/person/month, Grow ~$4/person/month, OKRs ~$8/person/month, Compensation ~$6/person/month. A company using Performance plus Engagement pays approximately $15/person/month. Full platform activation (all modules) approaches $29+/person/month. Annual contracts and volume discounts are available. A formal quote requires a sales conversation.
Question 4
No. Culture Amp does not offer a native compensation management module. HR teams that need to run merit cycles, manage compensation bands, or connect performance ratings to compensation decisions will need a separate compensation tool or a platform like Lattice that includes Lattice Compensation. This is one of the reasons Lattice is often preferred over Culture Amp when the full people management lifecycle is in scope.
Question 5
Culture Amp's surveys are developed with academic partners and backed by a benchmarking database from thousands of organizations. This means Culture Amp can show how your engagement scores compare to industry, company size, and geographic peers — not just internal trends. Culture Amp's driver analysis identifies which engagement factors most correlate with outcomes at your specific organization, providing diagnostic depth that most other platforms don't match.
Question 6
Lattice can replace Culture Amp for companies that primarily need functional engagement surveys alongside performance management. For companies that need Culture Amp's benchmarking depth, driver analysis rigor, and people analytics sophistication, Lattice's engagement module is not a full replacement — it covers the use cases but with less analytical depth. The replacement decision depends on how much survey science quality matters versus platform consolidation.
Question 7
15Five is worth evaluating alongside Lattice and Culture Amp for companies prioritizing continuous feedback and weekly manager-employee check-ins over formal performance reviews. 15Five's strengths are in lightweight ongoing feedback loops, OKR tracking, and manager effectiveness. Its engagement analytics and performance calibration tools are less developed than both Lattice and Culture Amp for companies with formal HR programs.
Question 8
Culture Amp Engage (surveys only) can be deployed in 1–2 weeks from contract signing — the platform is designed for fast survey launch. Adding Culture Amp Perform (performance reviews) typically extends implementation to 4–8 weeks depending on review cycle customization requirements. Culture Amp's HR science team provides onboarding support and survey design guidance, which is a practical advantage for companies running structured engagement programs for the first time.
Question 9
Culture Amp has stronger people analytics, particularly for engagement data. Its driver analysis, heatmap reporting, cohort comparisons, and external benchmarking are more sophisticated than Lattice's analytics. For companies with a dedicated people analytics function or that need to present engagement data to leadership with external benchmarks, Culture Amp's analytics infrastructure is the stronger choice.
Question 10
Yes. Lattice integrates with major HRIS platforms including BambooHR, Rippling, Workday HCM, ADP, and others for employee data sync. Employee records, org structure, and department hierarchies flow from the HRIS into Lattice automatically, eliminating manual data entry. Culture Amp also supports HRIS integrations with the same major platforms.
Question 11
For companies under 150 employees, both Lattice and Culture Amp may be more platform than needed. Lighter tools like 15Five, Leapsome, or even BambooHR's built-in performance module may be more cost-effective starting points. Between Lattice and Culture Amp at smaller headcounts, Lattice's modular pricing allows starting with just Performance Management, keeping the initial cost lower than Culture Amp's typically bundled pricing.
Question 12
Yes. Culture Amp is frequently purchased for Engage (engagement surveys and people analytics) only, without the Perform module. Many companies use Culture Amp as their engagement platform and a separate tool (or their HRIS) for performance reviews. This is a common evaluation path where Culture Amp wins on engagement analytics but the company keeps performance reviews in BambooHR, Lattice, or their HRIS.
Full profiles with pricing details, integrations, and editorial reviews.
Lattice helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.
Culture Amp helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.