15Five
15Five helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.
15Five is better for companies that want lightweight continuous feedback, weekly check-ins, and employee engagement tools with fast adoption. Lattice is better for companies building out the full people management stack — performance reviews, OKRs, compensation management, and engagement — as a unified platform. This comparison covers pricing, feature depth, adoption overhead, and what should decide this shortlist.
15Five and Lattice both offer performance and engagement features, but Lattice has built a significantly broader platform. 15Five remains more focused on continuous feedback, check-ins, and manager-employee communication cadences. Lattice has expanded into OKRs, compensation management, learning, and HRIS. The decision often depends on whether you want a focused continuous feedback tool or a people operations platform that consolidates multiple HR functions. Buying Lattice for check-in features alone is likely overpaying for unused capability.
Why trust this comparison
Independent editorial comparison. No vendor paid for placement. Named author attribution, visible update dates, and analysis written for buyers — not vendors.
15Five helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.
Lattice helps people teams run pulse surveys, measure sentiment, and turn employee feedback into action.
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, deployment, platform support, and trial availability.
15Five and Lattice overlap on several features — both offer performance reviews, OKRs, 1:1 tools, and employee surveys. But they are designed around different philosophies. 15Five's philosophy is that performance management should be a lightweight, employee-first practice: weekly check-ins, frequent recognition, and manager coaching are the habit-forming behaviors that build high-performing teams. The product is designed to be adopted by employees and managers without heavy HR intervention.
Lattice's philosophy is that people management should be a unified system: performance, goals, compensation, engagement, and career growth should all live in one platform so HR leaders can see the connections between them. Lattice is designed for HR professionals who want to make data-driven people strategy decisions — not just improve manager-employee communication.
Buyers shortlisting 15Five and Lattice are typically companies between 100 and 1,000 employees that are investing in people management infrastructure for the first time, or companies that have outgrown a basic HRIS's performance module and need a purpose-built performance management system.
Weekly check-ins and continuous feedback are 15Five's most differentiated feature. 15Five's weekly check-in template — a structured 5-minute reflection where employees report on wins, blockers, and sentiment — is the core of the product. Managers receive a consolidated view of team check-ins and can respond directly, creating a habit of weekly visibility without the overhead of monthly 1:1 scheduling. Lattice has 1:1 features but the weekly check-in habit loop is not as central to its design.
Compensation management is Lattice's most differentiated feature. Lattice's compensation module connects performance data (review scores, goal attainment) to compensation recommendations — managers and HR can run merit review cycles with recommended adjustments based on performance tiers and market benchmarks. 15Five does not have a compensation management module. For companies running merit cycles and wanting performance data to drive comp decisions, Lattice's integrated approach is the meaningful capability.
OKR management is available in both platforms. Lattice's OKR module is more sophisticated — cascade OKRs from company to team to individual, track progress with key result updates, and see OKR attainment in the performance review context. 15Five's OKR capabilities are available and functional but less deeply integrated with the compensation and career growth features. For companies where OKR governance is a serious HR practice, Lattice's implementation is more enterprise-grade.
Employee engagement surveys are available in both platforms. 15Five's Engage module provides regular pulse surveys and an employee net promoter score (eNPS) with manager-level visibility. Lattice's engagement module also provides surveys and eNPS with comparisons to industry benchmarks and demographic segment analysis. Lattice's engagement analytics are deeper, but 15Five's frequency and simplicity drive higher completion rates in some organizations.
Manager training and development is a 15Five differentiator. 15Five invests specifically in helping managers become better coaches — the platform includes research-backed manager training content (from the Humu acquisition) and guided coaching tools that help managers have better 1:1 conversations. Lattice focuses on growth plans and career paths rather than manager skills development. For companies investing specifically in manager quality, 15Five's coaching tools are purpose-built.
Drop 15Five from the shortlist if: compensation management integration is required, career growth planning is a near-term priority, or your HR team needs a unified platform for performance, OKRs, and comp rather than a feedback-first tool. Drop Lattice from the shortlist if: adoption simplicity is paramount, your HR team is lean, or the additional cost and implementation overhead of Lattice's full suite is not justified by your current HR program maturity.
15Five publishes pricing. The Engage module (surveys and engagement) is $4 per person per month. The Perform module (performance reviews, OKRs, 1:1s) is $10 per person per month. The Total Platform is $14 per person per month for the combined product. Annual contracts are standard. For a 100-person company on Total Platform, the cost is $1,400/month ($16,800/year).
15Five's modular pricing allows companies to start with what they need and expand. Many companies start with Engage only (at $4/person), validate the value, and then add Perform. This incremental adoption path is lower risk than committing to a full platform upfront.
Lattice does not publish full pricing publicly. Based on market data, Lattice pricing starts around $11 per person per month for the core performance management module, with additional modules (engagement, OKRs, compensation, HRIS) priced separately. A company using Lattice's full suite (performance, engagement, and compensation) typically pays $15–$20+ per person per month. For a 100-person company, the full suite costs approximately $1,500–$2,000/month.
Lattice's module-based pricing means total cost depends on which products are activated. The compensation management module adds significant cost. Companies that start with Lattice's performance module and add compensation and engagement over time can manage costs incrementally, but the full platform cost is higher than 15Five's total platform pricing.
15Five is designed for fast time-to-value. Companies can be running weekly check-ins within days of setup. The product is designed for employee adoption without training — the weekly check-in is a simple, structured prompt that takes 5 minutes. Manager visibility into team check-ins is immediate. For companies that want performance management to start happening quickly, 15Five's low configuration overhead is an advantage.
Lattice requires more configuration to deliver full value. Setting up review cycles, configuring competency frameworks, designing growth plan templates, and connecting OKRs to performance reviews requires deliberate HR design work. Implementation typically takes 4–8 weeks for a full deployment. The configuration investment is appropriate for companies building a comprehensive people management system — it is overhead for companies that just want better feedback habits.
15Five is built for companies that want performance management to be a cultural habit, not an administrative process. The ideal 15Five customer is a company with 50–500 employees where manager-employee communication quality is the primary investment, leadership wants visibility into employee sentiment and blockers without waiting for annual reviews, and HR wants to drive adoption without significant change management. 15Five is particularly effective in remote and hybrid workforces where regular check-ins replace informal office visibility.
15Five's honest cautions: it is not a compensation management platform. Its OKR module is functional but not as enterprise-grade as Lattice's. Companies that specifically need performance data to drive comp cycles, career ladders, or executive people analytics will find 15Five's depth insufficient. And 15Five's value depends on manager adoption — if managers don't engage with check-ins, the platform's signal deteriorates.
Lattice is built for HR leaders at growing companies who want a unified system for all of people management. The ideal Lattice customer has a dedicated HR team, is building out performance, compensation, and engagement programs simultaneously, and wants a single platform from which people strategy decisions are made. Lattice is particularly strong for companies that have committed to competency-based performance management and want to connect review outcomes to compensation and career progression.
Lattice's honest cautions: the platform requires HR investment to configure and maintain. For companies without dedicated HR resources, Lattice's breadth can create configuration overhead that reduces adoption. The pricing at full suite is higher than 15Five. And Lattice's depth is underutilized if HR doesn't actively run compensation cycles, career growth programs, and engagement analytics as integrated practices.
Is 15Five or Lattice better for performance management? It depends on what you mean by performance management. 15Five is better for continuous feedback and manager-employee communication habits. Lattice is better for structured review cycles, OKR governance, and connecting performance to compensation decisions. Most HR teams do better with Lattice if they have the resources to use it fully.
Does 15Five or Lattice handle compensation management? Lattice has a compensation management module that connects performance data to merit review recommendations. 15Five does not have a compensation management module. For companies running merit cycles where performance scores directly inform comp adjustments, Lattice's integrated compensation management is a meaningful differentiator.
How much does 15Five cost vs Lattice? 15Five's Total Platform is $14/person/month. For a 100-person company, that is $1,400/month ($16,800/year). Lattice's full suite is approximately $15–$20+/person/month depending on modules. A 100-person company on Lattice's full suite pays approximately $1,500–$2,000/month. 15Five is modestly less expensive at comparable module coverage.
What is 15Five's weekly check-in? 15Five's weekly check-in is a 5-minute structured reflection employees complete each week — reporting on wins, blockers, priorities, and sentiment. Managers see their team's check-ins in a consolidated dashboard and can respond directly. The check-in creates a lightweight habit loop of continuous manager-employee communication without the scheduling overhead of weekly 1:1 meetings.
Does Lattice have a free trial? Lattice offers demo access but not a self-serve free trial. Evaluation requires a sales conversation and demo. 15Five offers a free trial for new accounts. For buyers who want to evaluate the product before engaging sales, 15Five's trial access is lower friction.
Is Lattice or Culture Amp better? Lattice and Culture Amp both offer performance and engagement features. Culture Amp is stronger on employee engagement analytics and benchmarking. Lattice is stronger on connecting performance to compensation management. For companies prioritizing engagement data quality, Culture Amp. For companies prioritizing the performance-compensation connection, Lattice.
Does 15Five have OKR functionality? Yes. 15Five's Perform module includes OKR creation, progress tracking, and alignment visibility from company to team to individual. The OKR module is functional and integrated with check-ins and performance reviews. For companies wanting enterprise-grade OKR governance with complex cascade structures, Lattice's OKR implementation is more robust.
What is the difference between 15Five Engage and Perform? 15Five Engage (at $4/person/month) covers employee engagement surveys, eNPS, and pulse checks. 15Five Perform ($10/person/month) covers performance reviews, OKRs, 1:1 agendas, and manager tools. The Total Platform ($14/person/month) combines both. Companies can start with Engage only and add Perform when ready — the modular pricing allows incremental adoption.
Is Lattice good for remote teams? Yes. Lattice's performance reviews, 1:1 tools, and OKR tracking are all async-friendly and work well for distributed teams. 15Five is also frequently used by remote-first companies — the weekly check-in model was designed partly for the remote context where informal office visibility is absent.
Does 15Five include manager training? Yes. 15Five includes manager development content through its coaching framework — structured guidance for managers on how to respond to check-ins, conduct effective 1:1s, and handle common people management situations. This manager coaching content is more integrated into 15Five's daily workflow than Lattice's manager tools.
What are the best alternatives to 15Five and Lattice? Culture Amp (strong on engagement analytics and benchmarking), Leapsome (European-founded, strong on learning and development integration), Betterworks (OKR-first performance management), and Workday Peakon (enterprise engagement within Workday HCM) are the main alternatives. For companies between 15Five and Lattice in requirements, Leapsome is worth evaluating for its balance of feedback, development, and learning features.
At what company size should I use Lattice vs 15Five? Company size is less decisive than HR team maturity. 15Five works from 50 employees to thousands when the primary need is continuous feedback and manager communication. Lattice makes more sense when there is a dedicated HR team that will actively use performance data for compensation decisions and career growth tracking — typically when HR has 3+ team members and is building people strategy infrastructure.
Question 1
15Five is better for continuous feedback culture and manager-employee communication habits — the weekly check-in model creates lightweight but consistent visibility. Lattice is better for structured review cycles, OKR governance, and connecting performance to compensation decisions. Choose 15Five for feedback culture; choose Lattice when HR needs a unified platform for performance, OKRs, and comp as connected strategic functions.
Question 2
Lattice has a compensation management module that connects performance review data to merit review recommendations — managers can run comp cycles with performance-informed adjustments and market benchmarks. 15Five has no compensation module. For companies where merit cycles need to be tied to performance scores, Lattice's integrated compensation management is the differentiating capability.
Question 3
15Five's Total Platform is $14/person/month — a 100-person company pays $1,400/month ($16,800/year). Lattice's full suite (performance, engagement, compensation) runs $15–$20+/person/month — the same company pays $1,500–$2,000/month. 15Five is modestly cheaper at comparable module coverage, and its modular pricing lets you start at $4/person (Engage only) and expand.
Question 4
15Five's weekly check-in is a 5-minute structured employee reflection — wins, blockers, priorities, and sentiment — that creates consistent manager-employee visibility without scheduling 1:1 meetings for every check-in. Managers see their team's consolidated check-ins in a dashboard and respond directly. The check-in habit loop is 15Five's core design principle and its most differentiated feature versus Lattice.
Question 5
15Five is significantly easier to adopt — employees can start completing check-ins the same week the platform launches, with minimal training. Lattice requires more configuration to deliver full value: review cycle design, competency frameworks, OKR structure, and compensation module setup take dedicated HR time before the platform is operational. 15Five's fast time-to-value is an advantage for companies that want adoption before investment.
Question 6
Culture Amp is stronger on employee engagement analytics and industry benchmarking — it's the engagement-first platform. Lattice is stronger on connecting performance reviews to compensation management. For companies prioritizing engagement data quality and benchmarking, Culture Amp. For companies prioritizing the performance-compensation-career growth connection as a unified system, Lattice.
Question 7
Yes — 15Five's Perform module includes OKR creation, progress tracking, and company-to-individual alignment visibility. The OKR module integrates with check-ins and performance reviews. For enterprise-grade OKR governance with complex cascade structures and cross-functional alignment at large scale, Lattice's OKR implementation is more robust. 15Five's OKRs work well for teams up to a few hundred people.
Question 8
Yes — 15Five includes manager coaching content and guided frameworks for check-in responses, 1:1 conversations, and common people management situations. This manager development layer is more integrated into 15Five's daily workflow than Lattice's approach. For companies specifically investing in manager quality as a cultural lever, 15Five's coaching tools are purpose-built for that goal.
Question 9
The trigger is HR function maturity, not company size. Lattice makes sense when HR has a dedicated team that will actively use performance data for compensation decisions, career growth tracking, and leadership analytics — typically when HR has 3+ staff and is building integrated people strategy infrastructure. Before that point, 15Five's lower overhead and faster adoption typically deliver more value per dollar.
Question 10
Culture Amp (engagement analytics and benchmarking), Leapsome (learning and development integration with performance), Betterworks (OKR-first performance management), and Workday Peakon (enterprise engagement within Workday) are the main alternatives. For companies between 15Five and Lattice in requirements, Leapsome's balance of feedback, development, and learning features is worth evaluating.
Question 11
At 200 employees, Lattice's full suite runs approximately $3,000–$4,000/month. That is worth it when: HR is actively running merit cycles using performance data, career growth plans are a retention strategy, and executive teams are reviewing people analytics. It is hard to justify if HR is lean, the platform won't be fully used, or the same outcomes could come from a simpler, cheaper tool like 15Five.
Question 12
Yes — 15Five integrates with major HRIS systems including BambooHR, Workday, ADP, and Rippling for employee data synchronization. These integrations keep employee directories current without manual updates. Lattice also integrates with major HRIS platforms. Both platforms are designed to serve as the performance management layer on top of an existing HRIS, not as a replacement for one.
Full profiles with pricing details, integrations, and editorial reviews.